Forum
Read and express views
× Latest Case Laws on Income Tax by various Income Tax Appellate Tribunals in India

These are the latest case laws decided by various Income Tax Appellate Tribunals (ITAT) of India on Income Tax which have been published recently. The case laws are open for discussion and we invite expert comments from our members on its applicability and effect on relevant issues.

12-04-2019, Fulcrum Fund Services, Section 92, 40(a), Tribunal Bangalore

  • amit
  • amit's Avatar Topic Author
  • Offline
  • Administrator
  • Administrator
More
1 week 1 day ago #9129 by amit
Section - 92, 40(a), 92CA
Order Date - 12-04-2019
Favouring - Assessee Partly
Court - Tribunal Bangalore
Appellant - Fulcrum Fund Services (India) Private Limited
Respondent - ITO
Justice - N.V. VASUDEVAN VP & JASON P. BOAZ AM
Citation - 419Taxpundit164
Appeal No. - IT(TP)A No. 2521/Bang/2017
Asstt. Year - 2012-13

Order

PER : N V Vasudevan

This is an appeal by the assessee against the order dated 03-10-2017 of the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals)-3, Bengaluru, relating to Assessment Year 2012-13.

2. Ground Nos. 1 to 14 raised by the assessee in its appeal are with regard to correctness of the determination of Arm’s Length Price (ALP) in respect of an international transaction of rendering Information and Technology Enabled Services (ITES) by the assessee to its Associated Enterprise (AE). It is not in dispute that the transaction of rendering ITES, in the form of providing back office support for Hedge Fund related financial services to its group companies, is an international transaction and income arising from such transaction has to be determined having regard to the ALP as laid down in Section 92 of the Income Tax Act, 1961 (Act) It is also not in dispute between the assessee and the Revenue that the Profit Level Indicator (PLI) chosen for the purpose of comparing the assessee’s profit margin with the comparable companies was Operating Profit on Operating Cost. The assessee’s Operating Profit on Operating Cost was 20.53%, which was arrived at the following manner:

3. The most appropriate method adopted by the assessee and the Revenue for the purpose of determining ALP was the Transactional Net Margin Method (TNMM). The assessee had chosen 04 comparable companies and based on the Arithmetic Average Mean, profit margin of those 04 companies which was arrived at 17.46% concluded that the assessee’s profit margin being higher than that of the comparable companies, the price received by the assessee in the international transaction was at arm’s length.

4. The Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) to whom the determination of ALP was referred to by the Assessing Officer, rejected all the 04 comparable companies chosen by the assessee. He chose a set of 10 comparable companies, who’s Arithmetic Mean was 28.11% which was arrived at as follows:

4.1. Based on the above comparable companies and their profit mean and after giving working capital adjustment of (-)3.25%, the TPO arrived at an addition to be made to the total income on account of determination of ALP at a sum of Rs. 2,48,24,560/-, which was arrived at in the following manner:

12.4. Computation of Arm’s Length Price:

The arithmetic mean of the Profit Level indicators is taken as the arm’s length margin. Please see Annexure B for details of computation of PLI of the comparables. Based on this, the arm’s length price of the services rendered by the taxpayer to its AE(s) is computed as under The above shortfall of Rs. 248,24,560/- is treated as transfer pricing adjustment u/s.92CA in respect of ITES segment of the taxpayer’s international transactions”.

4.2. Aggrieved by the aforesaid addition made by the Assessing Officer, consequent to determination of ALP, the assessee filed an appeal before the CIT(A).

5. The CIT(A) upheld the order of TPO regarding choosing of comparable companies.

5.1. With regard to allowing negative working capital adjustment, the CIT(A) held that the negative working capital adjustment done by the TPO was not proper. As a result, the Arithmetic Average Mean on profit margins, which was arrived at TPO at 31.36% stood reduced to 28.11% [28.11 + (-)3.25%, towards negative working capital = 31.36%].

5.2. Aggrieved by the order of Ld.CIT(A) in upholding the comparables chosen by the TPO, assessee has preferred an appeal before the Tribunal.

6. At the time of hearing of the appeal, Ld.counsel for the Assesseepressed for adjudication of only Ground No. 5, which reads as under:

Gr.No. 5: The learn d AO/learned TPO/Hon'ble CIT(A) erred in not applying the upp r limit on turnover while selecting the comparable companies.

7. As far as Ground No. 5 is concerned, the same is with reference to application of the turnover filter. The TPO while choosing comparable companies, applied a filter whereby he excluded companies, whose turnover was less then Rs. 1 Crore, as companies which have to be regarded as small, compared to the turnover of the assessee, which was Rs. 27.61 Crores. The assessee’s contentions for the CIT(A) was that - when a lower turnover limit is applied for

Click to view and download Full Free Judgement of Fulcrum Fund Services (India) Private Limited vs. ITO

Unable to display Google Map.




Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.099 seconds

If You Appreciate What We Do Here On TaxPundit, You Should Consider:

We are thankful for your never ending support.

Latest Analysis - High Courts

PCIT vs. OM PRAKASH JAKHOTIA & ANR.

PCIT vs. OM PRAKASH JAKHOTIA & ANR.

PCIT vs. OM PRAKASH JAKHOTIA & ANR. Read More
Kingfisher Capital CLO Ltd. vs. CIT

Kingfisher Capital CLO Ltd. vs. CIT

Kingfisher Capital CLO Ltd. vs. CIT Read More
Plymex Timber Pvt. Ltd. & Anr vs ITO

Plymex Timber Pvt. Ltd. & Anr vs ITO

Plymex Timber Pvt. Ltd. & Anr vs ITO Read More
NATIONAL PROJECTS CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION LIMITED (NPCC) vs. DCIT

NATIONAL PROJECTS CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION LIMITED (NPCC) vs. DCIT

NATIONAL PROJECTS CONSTRUCTION CORPORATION LIMITED (NPCC) vs. DCIT Read More
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25
  • 26
  • 27
  • 28
  • 29
  • 30
  • 31
  • 32
  • 33
  • 34

Forum Features

Latest Case Laws
Latest Case Laws are instantly updated in the Forum into their respective section
Latest from CBDT
Latest Circulars, Notifications, Orders etc. from CBDT is updated in the Forum
Ask Experts
You can ask questions to the community
Support
Support queries are either replied via mail or in the Forum so that others can be benefited
Press Releases
Latest Press Notes and Press Releases are updated in the Forum
Connect with Members
You can connect with our community members by replying to their queries

Recommended Articles

 

SITE INFORMATION

All content herein is the copyright of Taxpundit. No images, text, or any other content may be, reproduced or redistributed without the express written consent of Taxpundit.

All Rights Reserved. All Content Copyright.

Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter and stay updated on the latest developments and special offers!

Create your own website as per ICAI guidelines. Plan starts at Rs. 15000/- with Free Premium Membership. Read more
Toggle Bar