Forum
Read and express views
× Latest Case Laws on Income Tax by various Income Tax Appellate Tribunals in India

These are the latest case laws decided by various Income Tax Appellate Tribunals (ITAT) of India on Income Tax which have been published recently. The case laws are open for discussion and we invite expert comments from our members on its applicability and effect on relevant issues.

10-01-2020, Shell Information Technology, Section 2(24), 234B, Tribunal Mumbai

  • amit
  • amit's Avatar Topic Author
  • Offline
  • Administrator
  • Administrator
More
8 months 1 week ago #12046 by amit
Section - 2(24), 234B, 244A, 14, 9 (1)(vi)
Order Date - 10-01-2020
Favouring - Assessee Partly
Court - Tribunal Mumbai
Appellant - Shell Information Technology International BV
Respondent - DCIT
Justice - C.N. PRASAD JM & S. RIFAUR RAHMAN AM
Citation - 120Taxpundit110
Appeal No. - ITA No. 7283/MUM/2018
Asstt. Year - 2015-16

Order

PER : C.N. PRASAD (JM)

1. This appeal is filed by the assessee against the order of the Dispute Resolution Panel–2, Mumbai [hereinafter for short “DRP”] dated 10.09.2018 for the A.Y. 2015-16.

2. Assessee has raised the following grounds in its appeal: -

“1. Erred in assessing the total income at Rs. 1,85,95,06,633 as against Rs. NIL total income offered in return of income by the Appellant.

Receipts towards access to use software and IT support services does not constitute 'income'

2. Erred in holding that the payments received by the Appellant constitutes 'income' without appreciating that the appellant works only on cost - only arrangement and the receipts were reimbursements being in the nature of cost allocation without markup and hence does not constitute 'income' under section 2(24) of the Act;

Receipts towards access to use software held as 'royalty' under the India-Netherlands DTAA

3. Erred in construing the payments of Rs. 48,18,78,884 received by the Appellant from Key Application Service provider and Shell group entities for access to use copyrighted software as royalty taxable under Article 12 of India - Netherlands Double Taxation Avoidance Agreement ('India - Netherlands DTAA');

4. Failed to appreciate that the payments received were only for the 'use of copyrighted article' as compared to 'use of copyright', 'use of process', 'use of property similar to patents, design, trademark and invention', which does not constitute 'royalty' under the IndiaNetherlands DTAA; Receipts towards IT Support services held as 'Fees for Technical Services' CFTS ) und r the Act as well as IndiaNetherlands DTAA

5. Erred in holding that payments of Rs. 1,37,76,27,749 received by the Appellant for IT Support Services constitutes 'FTS' under the provisions of the Act and under Article 12 of the India-Netherlands DTAA;

6. Failed to appreciate that IT support services do not 'make available' any technical knowledge, experience, skill, know-how or processes etc. to the service recipient under Article 12 of the IndiaNetherlands DTAA and hence not subject to tax in India. Interest under section 234B of the Act

7. Erred in levying interest under section 234B of the Act without appreciating the facts and circumstances of the case.

Refund adjusted against demand for earlier years

8. Erred in adjusting the refund without appreciating the fact there is no demand outstanding pertaining to earlier years as the appellant has already received a favorable ITAT order for earlier years.

Interest under Section 244A of the Act

9. Erred in recovering interest under Section 244A of the Act without appreciating the facts and circumstances of the case. Interest under Section 234D of the Act

10. Erred in levying interest under Section 234D of the Act without appreciating the facts and circumstances of the case.”

3. At the outset Ld. Counsel for the assessee submitted that Ground Nos. 3 and 4 are in respect of receipts towards access to use software held as “royalty” under the India– Netherlands DTAA, s decided by the Tribunal in favour of the assessee for the A.Ys 2012-13 and 2013-14 in ITA No. 2192 & 2193/Mum/2017 dated 24 10.2018 and also for the A.Y. 2014-15 in ITA No. 7428/MUM/2017 dated 05.03.2019. It was also submitted that the very same issue was also decided in its favour by the Tribunal for the A.Y. 2006-07 to 2010-11 and the orders were placed in the paper book.

4. Ld. DR vehemently supported the orders of the authorities below.

5. We have heard the rival submissions and perused the orders of the authorities below and the orders of the Tribunal for various assessment years. The Tribunal decided this issue in favour of assessee initially for the A.Y. 2006-07 to 2008-09 in ITA.No. 5051/MUM/2009, 3818/Mum/2011 and ITA.No. 728/Mum/2012 dated 15.03.2017 wherein the Tribunal held that the payments received by the assessee from Wipro/IBM in pursuance

Click to view and download Full Free Judgement of Shell Information Technology International BV vs. DCIT

Unable to display Google Map.




Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.123 seconds

If You Appreciate What We Do Here On TaxPundit, You Should Consider:

We are thankful for your never ending support.

Latest Analysis - High Courts

PCIT vs. Nathji Goverdhan Nathji Charitable Trust

PCIT vs. Nathji Goverdhan Nathji Charitable Trust

PCIT vs. Nathji Goverdhan Nathji Charitable Trust Read More
PCIT vs. Eight Roads Investment Advisors Pvt. Ltd.

PCIT vs. Eight Roads Investment Advisors Pvt. Ltd.

PCIT vs. Eight Roads Investment Advisors Pvt. Ltd. Read More
EXPERION DEVELOPERS PVT LTD. vs. ACIT

EXPERION DEVELOPERS PVT LTD. vs. ACIT

EXPERION DEVELOPERS PVT LTD. vs. ACIT Read More
PCIT vs. MLS CBRE SOUTH ASIA PRIVATE LIMITED

PCIT vs. MLS CBRE SOUTH ASIA PRIVATE LIMITED

PCIT vs. MLS CBRE SOUTH ASIA PRIVATE LIMITED Read More
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25
  • 26
  • 27
  • 28
  • 29
  • 30
  • 31
  • 32
  • 33
  • 34
  • 35
  • 36
  • 37
  • 38
  • 39
  • 40
  • 41
  • 42
  • 43
  • 44
  • 45
  • 46
  • 47
  • 48
  • 49
  • 50

Forum Features

Latest Case Laws
Latest Case Laws are instantly updated in the Forum into their respective section
Latest from CBDT
Latest Circulars, Notifications, Orders etc. from CBDT is updated in the Forum
Ask Experts
You can ask questions to the community
Support
Support queries are either replied via mail or in the Forum so that others can be benefited
Press Releases
Latest Press Notes and Press Releases are updated in the Forum
Connect with Members
You can connect with our community members by replying to their queries

Recommended Articles

 

SITE INFORMATION

All content herein is the copyright of Taxpundit. No images, text, or any other content may be, reproduced or redistributed without the express written consent of Taxpundit.

All Rights Reserved. All Content Copyright.

Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter and stay updated on the latest developments and special offers!

Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme announced in Union Budget, 2020. Download Now
Toggle Bar