Read and express views
× Latest Case Laws on Income Tax by various High Courts of India

These are the latest case laws decided by various High Courts of India on Income Tax which have been published recently. The case laws are open for discussion and we invite expert comments from our members on its applicability and effect on relevant issues.

27-02-2019, Veisa Technologies, Section 246(A), 220(3), HIGH COURT OF MADRAS

  • amit
  • amit's Avatar Topic Author
  • Offline
  • Administrator
  • Administrator
2 months 6 days ago #8797 by amit
Section - 246(A), 220(3)
Order Date - 27-02-2019
Favouring - Revenue
Appellant - Veisa Technologies
Respondent - ACIT
Citation - 319Taxpundit245
Appeal No. - W.M.P.(MD).Nos.3608 & 3609 of 2019
Asstt. Year - 2016-17



The instant writ petition has been filed challenging the demand made by the first respondent in notice No. ITBA/AST/S/156/ 2018-19/1014609697(1) dated 27.12.2018.

2. It is the case of the petitioner that the first respondent passed an assessment order dated 27 12.2018 under Section 143(3) of the Income Tax Act directing the petitioner to pay a sum of Rs. 3,01,58,680/- (Rupees Three Crores and One Lakh Fifty Eight Thousand Six Hundred and Eighty only) as income tax for the assessment year 2016-17. Aggrieved by the assessment order dated 27.12.2018, passed by the first respondent, the petitioner preferred an appeal before the second respondent under section 246(A) of the Income Tax Act on 27.01.2019. Along with the assessment order dated 27.12.2018, passed by the first respondent, the impugned demand on the same date was sent by the first respondent, demanding a sum of Rs.3,01,58,680/- as income tax. The petitioner has now challenged the impugned demand made by the first respondent in this Writ Petition, pending the appeal before the first respondent on the ground that the objections raised by the petitioner were not considered by the first respondent in the assessment order dated 27.12.2018.

3. Heard Mr.R.Sundar, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.N.Dilip Kumar, learned standing counsel appearing on behalf of the respondents.

4. Mr.N.Dilip Kumar, learned standing counsel appearing for the respondents brought to the notice of this Court, the Office Memorandum dated 31.07.2017, issued by the Ministry of Finance, Government of India, which reads as follows:-

“Instruction No.1914 dated 21.03.1996 contains guidelines issued by the Board regarding procedure to be followed for recovery of outstanding demand, including procedure for grant of stay of demand. Vide O.M.No.404/72/93-ITCC dated 29.02.2016, revised guidelines were issued in partial modification of Instrumentation No.1914, wherein, inter alia, vide para 4(A) it had been laid down that in a case where the outstanding demand is disputed before CIT(A), the Assessing Officer shall grant stay of demand till disposal of first appeal on payment of 15% of the disputed demand unless the case falls in the category discussed in para (B) thereunder. Similar reference to the standard rate of 15% have also been made in succeeding paragraphs therein.

The matter has been reviewed by the Board in the light of feedback received from field authorities. In view of the Board's efforts to contain over pitched assessments through several measures resulting in fairer and more reasonable assessment orders, the standard rate of 15% of the disputed demand is found to be on the lower side. Accordingly, it has been decided that the standard rate prescribed in O.M. dated 29.02.2016 be revised to 20% of the disputed demand, where the demand is contested before CIT(A). Thus, all reference to 15% of the disputed demand in the aforesaid O.M. dated 29.02.2016 hereby stand modified to 20% of the disputed demand. Other guidelines contained in the O.M. dated 29.02.2016 shall remain unchanged.”

5. As seen from the Official Memorandum, once 20% of the disputed demand is paid, the Assessing Officer shall grant stay of the demand till disposal of the Appeal, unless the case falls under the category discussed in paragraph (B). Paragraph (B) as found in the official memorandum dated 29.02.2016 issued by the Government of India, Ministry of Finance, Central Board of Direct Taxes (CBDT) reads as follows:

Click to view and download Full Free Judgement of Veisa Technologies vs. ACIT

Unable to display Google Map.

Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.

Time to create page: 0.113 seconds

If You Appreciate What We Do Here On TaxPundit, You Should Consider:

We are thankful for your never ending support.

Latest Analysis - High Courts

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25
  • 26
  • 27
  • 28
  • 29
  • 30
  • 31
  • 32
  • 33
  • 34
  • 35

Forum Features

Latest Case Laws
Latest Case Laws are instantly updated in the Forum into their respective section
Latest from CBDT
Latest Circulars, Notifications, Orders etc. from CBDT is updated in the Forum
Ask Experts
You can ask questions to the community
Support queries are either replied via mail or in the Forum so that others can be benefited
Press Releases
Latest Press Notes and Press Releases are updated in the Forum
Connect with Members
You can connect with our community members by replying to their queries

Recommended Articles



All content herein is the copyright of Taxpundit. No images, text, or any other content may be, reproduced or redistributed without the express written consent of Taxpundit.

All Rights Reserved. All Content Copyright.


Subscribe to our newsletter and stay updated on the latest developments and special offers!

Create your own website as per ICAI guidelines. Plan starts at Rs. 15000/- with Free Premium Membership. Read more
Toggle Bar