Forum
Read and express views
× Latest Case Laws on Income Tax by various High Courts of India

These are the latest case laws decided by various High Courts of India on Income Tax which have been published recently. The case laws are open for discussion and we invite expert comments from our members on its applicability and effect on relevant issues.

17-01-2019, ORACLE (OFSS) BPO, Section 260A, 10A, 80A(5), HIGH COURT OF DELHI

  • amit
  • amit's Avatar Topic Author
  • Offline
  • Administrator
  • Administrator
More
2 weeks 6 days ago #8489 by amit
Section - 260A, 10A, 80A(5), 43B, 40(a)(i)
Order Date - 17-01-2019
Favouring - Set Aside
Court - HIGH COURT OF DELHI
Appellant - PCIT
Respondent - ORACLE (OFSS) BPO SERVICES LTD
Justice - SANJIV KHANNA & CHANDER SHEKHAR
Citation - 119Taxpundit324
Appeal No. - ITA 593/2018
Asstt. Year - 2008-09

Order

PER : SANJIV KHANNA, J.

This appeal filed by the Revenue under Section 260A of the IncomeTax Act, 1961 in the case of M/s.Oracle (OFSS) BPO Services Ltd. („respondent-assessee‟, for short) relates to the assessment year 2009-10 and arises out of the order of the Income-Tax Appellate Tribunal („Tribunal‟ for short) dated 31st October, 2017.

2. Present appeal was admitted vide order dated 21st May, 2018.

3. Substantial question of law as re-framed vide order dated 05th September, 2018, reads as under:

“Did the Income Tax Appellate Tribunal (ITAT) fall into error in holding that the revised computation of deduction under Section 10A of the Income Tax Act, 1961 („the Act‟) for short) was permissible having regard to Section 10A (5) and Section 80A(5) of the Act?”

4. The respondent assessee engaged in the business of providing „Processing Outsourcing Services‟, during the assessment year in question had no other business activity apart from business activities covered under Section 10A of the Act. Accordingly, in return of income filed on 29th September, 2009 it had claimed deduction of Rs.17.87 crores under Section 10A of the Act with NIL taxable income under the head of „income from business and profession‟. In order to claim deduction under Section 10A of the Act the respondent-assessee had filed Form 56F along with its return. In addition, respondent – assessee, had earned income of Rs.19.66 lakhs on fixed deposit receipts from banks, which it declared as income under the head „Other Sources‟. Accordingly, the net taxable income was Rs.19.68 lakhs.

5. During the course of the assessment proceedings, the respondentassessee had filed a revised computation of income making suo motu disallowance of Rs.2,14,50,610/- and allowance of Rs.33,25,522/- from business income as declared which it claimed was inadvertently missed out, as per the details given below:

6. Exemption under Section 10A of the Act was accordingly revised with corresponding disallowance and allowance of Rs.2,14,50,610/- and Rs.33,25,522/- respectively. Revised Form 56F was filed.

7. The Assessing Officer reduced the amount of Rs.6,13,047/- i.e. the provision for leave encashment claimed on payment basis from the disallowance of Rs.2,14,50,610/- and treated the balance amount of Rs.2,08,37,563/- as income under the head income from „Other Sources‟.

8. Assessing Officer did not allow allowance of Rs.1,01,701/- on account of provision of bonus under Section 43B of the Act, Rs.25,83,809/- as expenditure allowable under Section 40(a) (i) of the Act, as it was disallowed in the previous year; and Rs.21,607/- as profit on sale of fixed assets and Rs.5,358/- on account of foreign exchange gain on capital expenditure.

9. The Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) observed and held that the findings of the Assessing Officer were contradictory for he had partly accepted the revised computation by allowing expenditure of Rs.6,13,047/- towards leave encashment, but had disallowed other allowances claimed by the respondent assessee in the revised computation. Contradiction was there as the Assessing Officer had considered the revised computation only to the extent it was beneficial to the Revenue, but no deduction of allowances

Click to view and download Full Free Judgement of PCIT vs. ORACLE (OFSS) BPO SERVICES LTD

Unable to display Google Map.




Time to create page: 0.087 seconds

If You Appreciate What We Do Here On TaxPundit, You Should Consider:

We are thankful for your never ending support.

Latest Analysis - High Courts

RAJAN BHATIA vs CBDT

RAJAN BHATIA vs CBDT

RAJAN BHATIA vs CBDT Read More
ALFA BHOJ LIMITED vs DCIT

ALFA BHOJ LIMITED vs DCIT

ALFA BHOJ LIMITED vs DCIT Read More
PCIT vs GEETANJALI CREDITS AND CAPITAL LIMITED

PCIT vs GEETANJALI CREDITS AND CAPITAL LIMITED

PCIT vs GEETANJALI CREDITS AND CAPITAL LIMITED Read More
BHARTI INFRATEL LIMITED vs. DCIT

BHARTI INFRATEL LIMITED vs. DCIT

BHARTI INFRATEL LIMITED vs. DCIT Read More
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25
  • 26
  • 27

Forum Features

Latest Case Laws
Latest Case Laws are instantly updated in the Forum into their respective section
Latest from CBDT
Latest Circulars, Notifications, Orders etc. from CBDT is updated in the Forum
Ask Experts
You can ask questions to the community
Support
Support queries are either replied via mail or in the Forum so that others can be benefited
Press Releases
Latest Press Notes and Press Releases are updated in the Forum
Connect with Members
You can connect with our community members by replying to their queries

Recommended Articles

 

SITE INFORMATION

All content herein is the copyright of Taxpundit. No images, text, or any other content may be, reproduced or redistributed without the express written consent of Taxpundit.

All Rights Reserved. All Content Copyright.

Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter and stay updated on the latest developments and special offers!

Create your own website as per ICAI guidelines. Plan starts at Rs. 15000/- with Free Premium Membership. Read more
Toggle Bar