×Latest Case Laws on Income Tax by various High Courts of India
These are the latest case laws decided by various High Courts of India on Income Tax which have been published recently. The case laws are open for discussion and we invite expert comments from our members on its applicability and effect on relevant issues.
04-09-2019,Piramal Investment Opportunities, Section 154, HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
Rule. Rule is made returnable forthwith. Taken up for final disposal.
2. The Petitioner had filed an application for rectification of the Income tax assessment order. Assistant Commissioner rejected it by the impugned order. The Commissioner held that since the Petitioner had filed an statutory appeal, it would not be proper to decide the rectification application.
3. The Petitioner is an investment fund. The Petitioner had filed its return of income for the Assessment Year 2015-16 on 8 October 2015. Petitioner had disclosed total income of Rs.65,65,84,797 being interest income earned on its investment. Petitioner paid Advance Tax of Rs.16,80,00,000/-. Petitioner’s case was selected for scrutiny assessment vide notice dated 28 July 2016. Petitioner filed its reply to the notice. Petitioner filed a revised return of income disclosing Nil income for the Assessment Year 2015-16. The scrutiny assessment was completed by the Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax, Mumbai. The Assessment order was passed on 30 December 2017. The Petitioner filed an appeal before the Commissioner of Income Tax (Appeals) on the ground that the Assessing Officer did not give credit of advance tax on Rs.16,80,00,000/-.
4. The Petitioner also made an application on 8 January 2018 under section 154 of the Income Tax Act to the Assistant Commissioner for rectification. The Petitioner stated that by a mistake apparent on record, the credit of payment of advance tax of Rs.16,80,00,000/- has not been given and Petitioner is entitled to a refund. The Assistant Commissioner accordingly rejected the rectification application by the impugned order dated 13 June 2019.
5. In the impugned order the Additional Commissioner commented that the Petitioner did not inform an appeal is filed on the same issue for which rectification was sought. The Commissioner stated that there could be a merit in the case, but the discussion is restricted to Section 154 of the Act. He opined that since the Petitioner is agitating on similar ground before the appellate authority it is not proper on the part of the Assistant Commissioner, following the doctrine of judicial discipline, to adjudicate on the same issue pending before the appellate authority. The Assistant Commissioner, observed that rectification application assumes character of a matter being sub-judice, it needs to be dismissed. Being aggrieved, the Petitioner has filed the present Petition.
6. We have heard Mr.Madhur Agarwal, learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner and Mr.Sham Walve, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Respondents.
7. The relevant provisions of the Section 154 read thus: ‘154.[(1) With a view to rectifying any mistake apparent from the record an income-tax authority referred to in section 116 may, -
(a) amend any order passed by it under the provisions of this Act;
[(b) amend any intimation or deemed intimation under sub-section (1) of section 143; ]]
[(c) amend any intimation under sub-section (1) of section 200A;]
[(d) amend any intimation under sub-section (1) of section 206CB ] [(1A) Where any matter has been considered and decided in any proceeding by way of appeal or revision rela ing to an order referred to in sub-section(1), the authority passing such order may, notwithstanding anything contained in any law for the time being in force, amend the order under that sub-section in relation to any matter other the matter which has been so considered and decided .]
(2) Subject to the other provisions of this section, the authority concerned -
(a) may make an amendment under sub-section
(1) of its own motion, and
(b) shall make such amendment for rectifying any such mistake which has been brought to its notice by the assessee [or by the deductor] [or by