Tribunals
Summary and Review of Case Laws Decided by Income Tax Appellate Tribunals
Wednesday, 02 September 2015 12:50

Section 50B - Slump Sale - Negative figure of the net worth should not be ignored for working out the capital gains in case of a slump sale and AO was right in adding the amount of liabilities being reflected in negative net worth - Mumbai Tribunal Featured

Written by
Rate this item
(1 Vote)

Gist

Negative figure of the net worth should not be ignored for working out the capital gains in case of a slump sale and the amount of 'Net worth' will be a negative figure and not Zero. Assessing Officer was right in adding the amount of liabilities being reflected in the negative net worth ascertained by the auditors of the assessee to the sale consideration for determining the capital gains on account of slump sale

Facts

1. Assessee company is engaged in the business of manufacturing and supply of non woven fabrics, automotive carpets, domestic carpets and blankets

2. AO found that in pursuance of the scheme of amalgamation approved by the Hon’ble high courts of Mumbai and Delhi the assessee sold its fabric lining and carpet manufacturing business to Hitkari hi-tech Filters private Limited on slump sale basis at a net consideration of Rs.10 lakhs,that the net worth of the undertaking was certified at negative figure of Rs. (-) 3,38,69, 898/- as per para 6(e) of the form no 3CEA

3. However while filing the return of income assessee computed capital gain u/s. 50B of the Act of Rs 10,00,000/- only without adjusting the negative net worth

4. The AO raised the query in that regard and held that the computation of capital gain u/s 50B was incorrect and the benefit arising to the assessee of Rs 3.38 Crores was further required to be adjusted upward

5. Assessee submitted that when net worth calculated u/s 50B was negative the cost of acquisition of the industrial undertaking would be taken as NIL

6. AO was not convinced and Placing reliance on the decision of Hon’ble supreme court in case of IPCA laboratories Limited (266 ITR 521)held that negative net worth u/s 50B should also be added to the sales consideration for working out cost acquisition of industrial undertaking. He increased the capital gain computation by Rs 3.38 Crores and charged capital gain of Rs 3,48,69,848/- u/s 50B of the Act

7. Assessee filed an appeal before the CIT(A) who confirmed the addition holding that the case of the Zuari Industries Limited was different,that the assessee had never proved that the industrial undertaking sold by the assessee was saddled with these liabilities

8. Being aggrieved by the CIT(A) order assessee moved to the Tribunal

9. Tribunal following the special bench decision in the case of Zuari Industries Limited decided this issue against the assessee

10. Other grounds were heard and decided partly in favour of assessee by the Tribunal

Adjudication

On Slump Sale : Special Bench - "Thus the question referred to the Special Bench is answered in negative by holding that the Assessing Officer was not right in adding the amount of liabilities being reflected in the negative net worth ascertained by the auditors of the assessee to the sale consideration for determining the capital gains on account of slump sale. However, we allow ground no.2 raised by the Revenue in its appeal by holding that the CIT(A) was not correct in coming to the conclusion that the negative figure of the net worth of Rs. 157 crore should be ignored for working out the capital gains in case of a slump sale. The summary of our conclusion is that the amount of 'Net worth' will be a negative figure of Rs. 157 crore and not Zero. Resultantly the amount of capital gain chargeable to tax will be Rs. 300 crore and not Rs. 143 crore as declared by the assessee"

Respectfully,following the above order of the Special Bench we decide ground no.1 against the assessee.

On not allowing deduction of Rs 2,03,46,191/- from the profits arising out of the sale of undertaking by way of slump sale while working out the income under the head profits and gains from business : We are of the opinion,that in the interest of justice, the matter should be restored back to the file of the FAA for fresh adjudication,who will decide the issue after affording a reasonable opportunity of hearing to the assessee.Ground no.2 is allowed in favour of the assessee,in part.

On Disallowance u/s 43B : Such claim requires verification and also ascertainment whether the conditions and requirements mentioned under circular no 496 is met by the assessee or not.Therefore,in the interest of justice,this ground of appeal is set aside to the file of AO with direction to verify the claim of the assessee in accordance with circular no 496 dated 25.09.1987 and decide the issue in accordance with law after providing proper opportunity to the assessee. Ground no.3 of appeal is allowed in favour of the assessee, in part.

Cases referred to

Zuari Industries Limited 95 SOT 563

IPCA laboratories Limited 266 ITR 521

V Summit securities Limited 19 Taxmann 102

Jt. CIT v. Saheli Leasing & Industries Ltd. 324 ITR 170

CGT v. N.S. Getti Chettiar 82 ITR 599 (SC)

CIT v. Anand Theatres 244 ITR 192

CIT v. Harprasad & Co. (P.) Ltd. 99 ITR 118 (SC)

CIT v. P. Doraiswamy Chetty 183 ITR 559

Premier Automobiles Ltd. v. ITO 264 ITR 193

Additional Info

Read 17146 times Last modified on Saturday, 13 February 2016 15:59
Anil B.

A practicing Chartered Accountant Anil B. acquired CA, CS and LL.B degrees with over 12 years of rich and diverse management experience across Banking & Financial Services, Insurance and the Logistics industry spanning various markets and geographies globally.

This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

Leave a comment

Thank you for reading! We welcome and appreciate your comments, but at the same time, make sure you are adding something valuable to this article. If you have any serious queries, suggestions or anything related to this article, feel free to share them, we really appreciate that.

If you want to give us any feedback or report any errors, you can email your concerns on taxpundit@taxpundit.org and we'll revert back soon.

Most Popular Case Summary

  • Default
  • Title
  • Date
  • Random
load more hold SHIFT key to load all load all

Recommended Articles

 

Have you done Analysis of any Case? Tell Us About It.

SITE INFORMATION

All content herein is the copyright of Taxpundit. No images, text, or any other content may be, reproduced or redistributed without the express written consent of Taxpundit.

All Rights Reserved. All Content Copyright.

Newsletter

Subscribe to our newsletter and stay updated on the latest developments and special offers!

Company Master Data Since 1900. More than 1.75 Million Records. Register/Login to get FREE access. Read more
Toggle Bar