Summary and Review of Case Laws Decided by Income Tax Appellate Tribunals
Sunday, 09 August 2015 10:09

Section 244A – Interest on interest not permitted – Bombay Tribunal

Written by
  • font size decrease font size increase font size
  • Print
  • Email
  • 1 comment
Rate this item
(0 votes)


The refund of tax is a mandate of law. When a refund is called for, interest has to be paid as interest is compensatory in nature. It always moves with the principle amount. However, the assessee is not entitled to interest on interest in view of the ratio laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of CIT vs. Gujarat Fluoro Chemicals 358 ITR 291 (SC).


  1. Assessee is beneficiary of specific family trust
  2. Assessment u/s 143(3) was done on protective basis as the income was assessed to tax on substantive basis in the case of main Trust
  3. Matter of main trust was pending with appellate authorities
  4. Main trust settled the dispute under KVSS
  5. In view of this the income in the hands of this present Trusts were deleted by the AO under section 16(5) of the Act vide order dated 28/11/2000 passed under section 155 of the Act and income of the assessee was computed at Nil.
  6. A.O. allowed refund without interest u/s 244A
  7. Assessee made application u/s 154 to grant the interest which was rejected by the AO as well by the CIT(A)
  8. Assessee moved to the Tribunal for interest as well as interest on interest.
  9. Revenue argued that the delay in the refund was caused because of the conduct of the assesses
  10. Tribunal allowed Interest on refund u/s 244A but denied interest on interest
  11. Appeal partly allowed in favour of assessee


1. The issue regarding grant of interest to the assessees is clearly covered by the decision of the Special Bench as well as Hon’ble Gujarat High Court which have not been contended to be reversed or modified. Therefore, we direct the Revenue to grant the interest to the assessee.

2. Assessee is not entitled to interest on interest in view of the ratio laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of CIT vs. Gujarat Fluoro Chemicals 358 ITR 291 (SC)

Case Referred to

Saurashtra Cement & Chemical Industries vs. ITO 194 PER 659

Modi Industries Ltd. vs. CIT, 216 ITR 759 Supreme Court

CIT vs. Gujarat Flouro Chemicals, 358 ITR 291 (SC)

Additional Info

Read 3098 times Last modified on Saturday, 13 February 2016 16:49

Amit is a Chartered Accountant and a part of Taxpundit's Support Team. He has experience in various industry sectors including manufacturing, power and utilities, financial services, alternative investments etc. He is a passionate blogger and keep writing articles on Income Tax for various publications.

This email address is being protected from spambots. You need JavaScript enabled to view it.

1 comment

  • Comment Link deepakkumar Sunday, 09 August 2015 10:33 posted by deepakkumar

    The issue of interest on interest is well settled by Honb. Supreme Court in its 2013 order in the case of Gujarat Fluoro Chemicals. And to expect interest on interest after this order is absurd.

Leave a comment

Thank you for reading! We welcome and appreciate your comments, but at the same time, make sure you are adding something valuable to this article. If you have any serious queries, suggestions or anything related to this article, feel free to share them, we really appreciate that.

If you want to give us any feedback or report any errors, you can email your concerns on and we'll revert back soon.

Recommended Articles


Have you done Analysis of any Case? Tell Us About It.


All content herein is the copyright of Taxpundit. No images, text, or any other content may be, reproduced or redistributed without the express written consent of Taxpundit.

All Rights Reserved. All Content Copyright.


Subscribe to our newsletter and stay updated on the latest developments and special offers!

Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme announced in Union Budget, 2020. Download Now
Toggle Bar