Case Summary - Reassessment

Summary and Review of Case Laws on Reassessment u/s 147

Displaying items by tag: 54

Subscribe to this RSS feed

Sunday, 30 April 2017 11:12

Deduction u/s 54 - Assessee is Entitled for Deduction even if Property purchased in Joint Names - Mumbai Tribunal

Deduction u/s 54 - Mumbai Tribunal

Jitendra V Faria vs Income Tax Officer

Published in Tribunal Cases

Wednesday, 10 February 2016 15:41

Capital Gains - Deduction u/s 54 is allowed even if investment made in the purchase of new residential property is located outside India - Mumbai Tribunal

Capital Gains - Deduction u/s 54 is allowed even if investment made in the purchase of new residential property is located outside India - Mumbai Tribunal

Income Tax Officer vs. Farokh Jal Deboo

Published in Tribunal Cases

Search - Summary

Categories
Supreme Court Cases (16) High Court Cases (200) Tribunal Cases (119)

Sections

2(7) 2(15) 2(22) 2(22)(e) 2(b) 4(i) 9(1) 10(2) 10A 10B 11 12 12A 12AA 13 14 14(A) 14A 22 23 24 28 32 35 35(2A) 35A 35D 36 36(1) 36(1)(ii) 36(1)(iii) 36(2) 37 37(1) 40(A) 40(a)(i) 40(a)(ia) 40(a)(iii) 40A 40A(2)(b) 40A(3) 40B 41 41(1) 43 43(5) 43B 44 44AB 45 47 48 50(2) 50B 50C 54 54(G) 54F 55A 68 69 69C 71(2) 72 73 80G 80HHC 80IA 80IB 80IB(7A) 80IC 80P 90 92 92C 92CA 92F 111A 115AC 115AD 115BBE 115JA 115JB 115WE 115WG 124 127 132 132(4) 133 133(6) 133A 139 139(1) 142(2A) 143(2) 143(3) 144(3) 144C 145 145(3) 147 148 150 151(2) 153A 153C 154 155(2) 158 158BB 158BC 158BE 158BFA 159(2) 192 194A 194C 194I 194J 195 199 201 201(1) 201(1A) 206C 244(1A) 244A 245 245C 245D 252 254 254(2A) 260A 263 264 269SS 271 271(1)(b) 271(1)(c) 271AAA 271D 274 276B 282 292C Rule 8D Rule 46A

Newsletter
Subscribe to our newsletter and stay updated on the latest developments and special offers!

Most Popular Case Summary

Default
Title
Date
Random

+Read More

Reassessment - AO has to, applying his mind to the materials, conclude that he has reason to believe that income of the Assessee has escaped assessment - Delhi Tribunal

2016-02-14 08:41:27

Income Tax Officer vs. Bajaj & Co. Pvt. Ltd.
Read More
+Read More

When the Disallowance is Based on Incorrect Facts Then There is No Infirmity in the Reassessment Proceedings - Kerala High Court

2018-03-31 09:27:53

CIT vs. PARRISONS ROLLER FLOUR MILLS PVT. LTD.
Read More
+Read More

Second proviso to Section 40(a)(ia) of the Act is declaratory and curative and has retrospective effect from 1st April 2005 - Assessee not in default and the payments u/s 194J without TDS to be allowed as deduction- Delhi High Court

2015-09-06 11:15:47

CIT vs. Ansal Land Mark Township Pvt. Ltd.
Read More

load more hold SHIFT key to load all load all

Recommended Articles

Secured Site by Alpha SSL

PCI Compliance

CCAvenue