High Courts
Summary and Review of Case Laws Decided by High Courts
Displaying items by tag: 148
Thursday, 30 May 2019 12:05
BEST CYBERCITY (INDIA) PVT. LTD. vs ITO
Published in
High Court Cases
Monday, 01 April 2019 15:46
Reassessment Notice u/s 147 | MAX VENTURES INVESTMENTS HOLDINGS PVT. LTD. vs ITO
Published in
High Court Cases
Tuesday, 10 July 2018 13:38
Failure to Issue Notice u/s 143(2) in Reassessment Proceedings u/s 148 : Reassessment is Bad in Law - Calcutta High Court
Published in
High Court Cases
Friday, 08 June 2018 16:51
Jurisdiction - Transfer of Case u/s 127(2)(a) - Notice u/s 148 for Reassessment held Valid - Delhi High Court
Published in
High Court Cases
Friday, 08 June 2018 16:23
Service of Notice u/s 148 at Factory Premises to Security Guard is Proper Service of Notice u/s 282 - Delhi High Court
Published in
High Court Cases
Saturday, 31 March 2018 14:57
When the Disallowance is Based on Incorrect Facts Then There is No Infirmity in the Reassessment Proceedings - Kerala High Court
Published in
High Court Cases
Wednesday, 14 March 2018 16:07
Reopening u/s 148 - Furnishing the Reasons Recorded to Assessee - Madras High Court
Published in
High Court Cases
Wednesday, 14 June 2017 11:49
Technical Fee - Whether Capital or Revenue Expenditure ? - Explained by Supreme Court
Published in
Supreme Court Cases
Friday, 14 April 2017 11:56
Assessing Officer is bound to dispose of objections to issuance of Notice u/s 148 by passing a speaking order - Madras High Court
Published in
High Court Cases
Monday, 12 September 2016 14:17
Capital Gains - Assessee is Entitled to Claim Exemption u/s 54F on One or More Flats - Reopening u/s 147 is Unsustainable - Madras High Court
Published in
High Court Cases
Most Popular Case Summary
- Default
- Title
- Date
- Random
-
When its merely one of emphasis on facts on which there is no dispute, this is surely an exercise within the jurisdiction of the High Court - Supreme Court
2016-01-22 09:16:00Ganapathy & Co vs. Commissioner of Income TaxRead More -
Premium Collected on Subscribed Share Capital is Not "Capital Employed in the Business of the Company" as per Section 35D - Supreme Court
2017-04-03 07:20:37Berger Paints India Ltd vs. CITRead More -
load more
hold SHIFT key to load all
load all
Recommended Articles
ABOUT TAXPUNDIT
Taxpundit.org provides Income Tax Case Laws, Circulars, Notification, Orders, Press Releases etc. to Members without any subscription.
Subscription is for extra tools, features and functionalities.
Vivad Se Vishwas Scheme announced in Union Budget, 2020. 