High Courts Case Analysis

High Courts

Summary and Review of Case Laws Decided by High Courts

Tuesday, 08 September 2015 14:52

Deductions u/s 10A or 10B - Tribunal cannot decline to maintain cross objections even if the ground is not raised earlier - Tribunal can decide appeal on any ground after giving opportunity of being heard - Delhi High Court

Deductions u/s 10A or 10B - Tribunal cannot decline to maintain cross objections even if the ground is not raised earlier - Tribunal can decide appeal on any ground after giving opportunity of being heard - Delhi High Court

Fast Booking (I) Pvt. Ltd. vs. DCIT

Published in High Court Cases

Search - Summary

Categories
Supreme Court Cases (16) High Court Cases (166) Tribunal Cases (119)

Sections

2(7) 2(15) 2(22) 2(22)(e) 2(b) 4(i) 9(1) 10(2) 10A 10B 11 12 12A 12AA 13 14 14(A) 14A 22 23 24 28 32 35 35(2A) 35A 35D 36 36(1) 36(1)(ii) 36(1)(iii) 36(2) 37 37(1) 40(A) 40(a)(i) 40(a)(ia) 40(a)(iii) 40A 40A(2)(b) 40A(3) 40B 41 41(1) 43 43(5) 43B 44 44AB 45 47 48 50(2) 50B 50C 54 54(G) 54F 55A 68 69 69C 71(2) 72 73 80G 80HHC 80IA 80IB 80IB(7A) 80IC 80P 90 92 92C 92CA 92F 111A 115AC 115AD 115BBE 115JA 115JB 115WE 115WG 124 127 132 132(4) 133 133(6) 133A 139 139(1) 142(2A) 143(2) 143(3) 144(3) 144C 145 145(3) 147 148 150 151(2) 153A 153C 154 155(2) 158 158BB 158BC 158BE 158BFA 159(2) 192 194A 194C 194I 194J 195 199 201 201(1) 201(1A) 206C 244(1A) 244A 245 245C 245D 252 254 254(2A) 260A 263 264 269SS 271 271(1)(b) 271(1)(c) 271AAA 271D 274 276B 282 292C Rule 8D Rule 46A

Newsletter
Subscribe to our newsletter and stay updated on the latest developments and special offers!

Most Popular Case Summary

Default
Title
Date
Random

+Read More

Section 37(1) - Where interlacing of the control & management, interlacing of the accounts etc exists, no new business is said to have been set up. Expenditure incurred on an aborted project is an allowable deduction u/s 37(1) - Bombay Tribunal

2015-09-03 06:50:58

ACIT VS Gravis Foods Pvt Ltd
Read More
+Read More

Non Deduction of TDS u/s 194A by Canara Bank to NOIDA : Assessee in Default : Supreme Court of India

2018-07-10 10:01:52

CIT vs. CANARA BANK
Read More
+Read More

Section 9(1)(vii) - Whatever is payable by a resident to a non-resident by way of fees for technical services, would not always come within the purview of s. 9(1)(vii) - Mumbai Tribunal

2016-03-15 07:57:40

Raytheon Ebasco Overseas Ltd vs. DCIT
Read More

load more hold SHIFT key to load all load all

Recommended Articles

Share With Us

Have you done Analysis of any Case? Tell Us About It.

ABOUT TAXPUNDIT

Taxpundit.org provides Income Tax Case Laws, Circulars, Notification, Orders, Press Releases etc. to Members without any subscription.

Subscription is for extra tools, features and functionalities.

Newsletter

Site Menu

Secured Site by Alpha SSL

PCI Compliance

CCAvenue